PDA

View Full Version : Black Farmers ask Congress for Compensation


suedanim
07-20-2004, 06:13 PM
Curious how so many white people believe that the end of social and governmental discrimination ended in 1964 or during the 60's, eh?

Here thaanatos... another shining example of dubya's attempts at rolling back the clock. He is a disgrace to this nation!


Black Farmers Ask Congress for Compensation (http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=5712812//url)
Tue Jul 20, 2004 02:28 AM ET

By Randy Fabi

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Thousands of black American farmers denied part of a landmark $2.3 billion civil rights settlement are asking Congress for one more chance at compensation, a farm group said on Tuesday.

John Boyd, president of the National Black Farmers Association, said he met with Democrats on Monday and was "very optimistic" that lawmakers would soon introduce legislation to help black farmers.

In 1999 under the Clinton administration, the federal government agreed to compensate black farmers for decades of racial discrimination that shut them out of billions of dollars in federal subsidies. The U.S. Department of Agriculture agreed to pay at least $50,000 to each eligible black farmer.

However, the USDA rejected payments to 82,000 of the 94,000 black farmers who applied -- or about 87 percent -- because of insufficient documentation and missed filing deadlines, according to a report released on Tuesday by the Environmental Working Group.

The USDA has paid black farmers $800 million of the $2.3 billion settlement, the group said.

"What we concluded is that this entire settlement has been a complete failure at every turn for the farmers," said Arianne Callender, the activist group's general counsel.

"The only place left for the farmers to receive justice is the United States Congress, which should step in and demand USDA pay off these claims and move on," she added.

Both groups criticized the Bush administration, saying it aggressively fought the black farmers' claims. The environmental group said the Justice Department spent 56,000 hours at a cost of $12 million to oppose some of the compensation claims.

"I think its a national disgrace ... for the Bush administration to come into office and put a screeching halt to payments," Boyd said.

The USDA denied any attempt to hinder payments to the farmers. The USDA said a court-appointed arbitrator was responsible for approving and denying each claim.

The court "has said the USDA has done an exemplary job in implementing its part of the consent decree," said USDA spokesman Ed Loyd.

The number of black farmers in the United States has steadily dwindled in the past decades, and they now represent about 1 percent of American growers.

thaanatos
07-20-2004, 08:35 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Thousands of black farmers have been denied payment under a landmark settlement of bias complaints against the Agriculture Department, according to a report released Monday by the Environmental Working Group and the National Black Farmers Association.

Most failed to meet an initial deadline for seeking restitution under a 1999 court-approved settlement. Of those who met the initial deadline, more than 60 percent have received compensation.

David Frantz, a lawyer who represented black farmers in the court case, said those who met application standards generally have been getting paid.

The report said about 96,000 black farmers sought restitution under the 1999 federal court settlement. However, 7,800 of them failed to meet either deadline for filing a claim.

When a farmer filed made a big difference. Of the 22,354 farmers who met the original October 1999 deadline -- six months after the settlement was filed in court -- only 8,623 have been rejected for compensation.

Many black farmers who said they weren't aware of the first deadline were allowed until Sept. 15, 2000, to file if they could show they missed the first deadline because of extraordinary circumstances, such as a serious illness or the aftermath of a hurricane.

Of the 65,947 claims filed between the first and second deadlines, 63,815 were rejected by an arbitrator, according the study released Monday.

The settlement, one of the largest in a civil rights case, was aimed at resolving a 1997 lawsuit by black farmers who said they had been systematically denied federal loans and subsidies because of their race.

To get a share of the money, the farmers had to show discrimination. With minimal documentation, black farmers were awarded payments of $50,000 if they could show they had applied for a loan or subsidy at an Agriculture Department office and that they had not been given treatment equal to similarly situated white farmers.

Those who could show overt discrimination could seek higher damages.

One farmer who opted out of the settlement was awarded $6.6 million last year.

Ed Loyd, an Agriculture Department spokesman, said the government has awarded a total of $657 million to claimants under the settlement and forgiven another $20 million in Farm Service Agency loans.

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/business/index.ssf?/newsflash/get_story.ssf?/cgi-free/getstory_ssf.cgi?f0320_BC_BlackFarmers&&news&newsflash-financial

Anonymous Idiot Savant
07-21-2004, 06:27 AM
Well... I could see giving them a second chance, for those who missed the deadline or those who might have been missing a form or two.

But if you don't meet the guidelines, well, you don't meet the guidelines.

But then again, it's harder to prove discrimination based on race than one might think.

It seems odd though, that based on when they filed... the numbers are so different.

1st filing date, 22,000 apply, 8,000 are rejected.

2nd filing date, 65,000 apply, 63,000 are rejected.

:dunno

thaanatos
07-21-2004, 01:47 PM
not if you consider human nature....

first round of applicants......parties who were aggreived by the actions of the government and were actively following the process to seek justice.....

second round of applicants.....folks who saw other people getting money and tried to figure out a way to get some for themselves......